Let be
The Taylor-Young's formula tells us that any function
Here is the decomposed form:
So,
Furthermore, setting down
So,
Recap of the main Taylor series
Starting from the main equation of the fundamental theorem of calculus:
So,
Performing an integration by parts, with a wise choice for
Then we do it again with:
And so on...
Thus, the function
So,
Furthermore, setting down
So,
Another notation used to characterize the remainder of an Taylor series is the Landau notation
If a function
It means that:
In our specific case, we study Taylor series at the neighbourhood of
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let us use the previously demonstrated method to calculate a Taylor series of the
We firstly verify that
Then, let us calculate the successive derivatives of order
Now, we apply the Taylor-Young's formula.
In our case, that would be:
We have seen above that this remainder is worth:
But,
Let us now frame this remainder in the interval
Using the property of growth of an integral, we do have:
Yet, we know thanks to
This leads us to a framing for
Performing an Taylor series of order
Moreover, the remainder of this Taylor series is worth:
With the Taylor-Lagrange's inequality, we can frame this remainder:
By compared growth of the limits, the factorial function outweighs the power of x function:
In the end, with the squeeze theorem:
So as a result, a Taylor series of the