We write \( |z| \) the module of a complex number \( z \).
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.05em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ |z| = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 } \end{gather*} \)
Modules of the opposite and the conjugate
$$ | z | = | - z | = |\overline{z}| $$
$$ | z z' | = | z| \hspace{0.2em}. |z' |$$
In the same way, we will have:
$$ \left| \frac{z}{z'} \right| = \frac{| \ z \ |}{ |z' |} $$
Module of a complex number raised to an integer power
$$ | z^n | = | z |^n $$
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.05em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \)
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ z = |z|.\left(cos(\theta) + isin(\theta) \right) \end{gather*} $$
We write \( arg(z) \) the argument of a cmplex number \( z \).
Arguments of conjugate and opposite
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} arg(\overline{z}) = -arg(z) \\ arg( -z) = \pi + arg(z) \end{gather*} $$
$$ arg( z z') = arg(z) + arg(z') $$
$$ arg\left(\frac{1}{z}\right) = -arg(z) $$
$$ arg\left(\frac{z}{z'}\right) = arg(z) -arg(z') $$
Argument of a complex number raised to an integer power
$$ arg(z^n) = n . arg(z) $$
We write \( \overline{z} \) the conjugate of a complex number \( z \).
Let be \( (x, y) \in \hspace{0.05em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace z \in \mathbb{C}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ \overline{z} = x -iy \end{gather*} \)
$$ \overline{z_1 + z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
In the same way,
$$ \overline{z_1 \textcolor{#8E5B5B}{-} z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em} \textcolor{#8E5B5B}{-} \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
$$ \overline{z_1 . z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em}. \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
$$ \overline{ \left( z_1 \over z_2 \right)} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \frac{\overline{z_1}}{ \overline{z_2}} $$
Complex number multiplied by its conjugate
$$ z \hspace{0.2em} . \overset{-}{z} = x^2 + y^2 $$
Conjugate of a complex number raised to an integer power
$$ \overline{z^n} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} (\overline{z})^n $$
Recap table of the properties of the complex numbers formulas
Click on the title to access to the recap table.
Let us write the complex numbers \( |-z|\) et \( | \overline{z} | \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} |-z| = \sqrt{(-x)^2 + (-y)^2} = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 } = |z| \\ | \overline{z} | = \sqrt{x' + (-y)^2 } = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 }= |z| \end{gather*} $$
And finally,
$$ | z | = | - z | = |\overline{z}| $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z, z' \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = x + iy \\ z' = x' + iy' \end{gather*} $$
Calculating \( z z' \), we do have:
Then, calculating \( | z z' | \):
In the end, calculating \( | z| \hspace{0.2em}. |z' | \) we do have:
We now notice that both expressions \( (1) \) and \( (2) \) are equals, so:
$$ | z z' | = | z| \hspace{0.2em}. |z' |$$
In the same way, we will have:
$$ \left| \frac{z}{z'} \right| = \frac{| \ z \ |}{ |z' |} $$
Let us write the complex number \(z\) under its algebraic form.
Let us no calculate \(z^n\):
Then,
But,
We definitely have,
$$ | z^n | = | z |^n $$
Let us write the complex number \(z\) under its trigonometric form.
Let us write the complex number \( \overline{z} \) under its trigonometric form.
But,
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} cos(\theta) = cos(-\theta) \\ -sin(\theta) = sin(-\theta) \end{gather*} $$
So,
Hence,
But,
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} -cos(\theta) = cos(\pi + \theta) \\ -sin(\theta) = sin(\pi + \theta) \end{gather*} $$
So,
Hence,
And as a result,
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} arg(\overline{z}) = -arg(z) \\ arg( -z) = \pi + arg(z) \end{gather*} $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z, z' \) under their trigonometric form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z = |z|.\left(cos(\theta) + isin(\theta) \right) \\ z' = |z'|.\left(cos(\theta') + isin(\theta') \right) \end{gather*} $$
Performing the product \( z z' \), we do obtain:
Thanks to the properties of the module \( | z | \), we know that:
So,
Now, thanks to the trigonometric addition formulas, we know that:
$$ \forall (\alpha, \beta) \in \hspace{0.05em} \mathbb{R}^2, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} sin(\alpha + \beta) = sin(\alpha) cos(\beta) + sin(\beta) cos(\alpha) \\ cos(\alpha + \beta) = cos(\alpha) cos(\beta) - sin(\alpha) sin(\beta) \end{gather*} $$
So that,
And as a result,
$$ arg( z z') = arg(z) + arg(z') $$
Let \(z \in \hspace{0.05em}\mathbb{C}^*\) be a non-zero complex number.
Let us start fro mthe following equation:
Then,
But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
So that,
And finally,
$$ arg\left(\frac{1}{z}\right) = -arg(z) $$
Let \(z \in \mathbb{C}\) be a complex number and \(z' \in \hspace{0.05em}\mathbb{C}^*\) a non-zero complex number.
Let us write the quotient \(\frac{z}{z'}\) under the form of a product:
But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
So that,
Now, we know that the argument of the inverse of a complex number is the opposite this complex number's argument:
So,
And as a result,
$$ arg\left(\frac{z}{z'}\right) = arg(z) -arg(z') $$
Let us write the complex number \( z \) under its trigonometric form.
Thanks to the properties of the module raised to an integer power \( | z^n | \), we know that:
So,
Now, thanks to trigonometric duplicaiton formulas, we know that:
$$ \forall \alpha \in \mathbb{R}, \enspace \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} sin(2\alpha) = 2 sin(\alpha) cos(\alpha) \\ cos(2\alpha) = cos^2(\alpha) - sin^2(\alpha) \end{gather*} $$
Thus, we identify that:
And,
Let us show by a recurrence that:
$$ arg(z^n) = n . arg(z) \qquad (S_n) $$
Thus, \((S_0)\) is true.
Let \( k \in \mathbb{N} \) be a nutral number.
Let us assume that the statement \((S_k)\) is true for all \( k \), and let us verify if it is also the case for \((S_{k + 1})\).
If it is so, we should obtain as a result that:
Consequently, let us calculate \(z^{k+1}\):
But, we know that the argument of a product is the sum of the product's factors of this product:
So in our case that,
And so on until:
Thus, \((S_{k + 1})\) is true in the natural numbers set \( \mathbb{N}\).
Let us now proove it backwards.
Let \( k \in \mathbb{Z} \) be an integer.
Let us assume that the statement \((S_k)\) is true for all \( k \), and let us verify if it is also the case for \((P_{k - 1})\).
If it is so, we should obtain as a result that:
Calculating now \(z^{k-1}\), we do have:
But, we know that the argument of a quotient of two complex numbers is the difference of arguments of these numbers:
So that,
Thus, \((P_{k - 1})\) is true for the integers set \( \mathbb{Z}\).
The statement \((S_n)\) is true for its first term \(n_0 = 0\) and it is hereditary from terms to terms for all \(n \in \mathbb{Z}\), increasingly and decreasingly.
Thus, by the recurrence principle, this is true for all \(n \in \mathbb{Z}\).
And finally, as a result we do have,
$$ arg(z^n) = n . arg(z) $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z_1, z_2 \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z_1 = x_1 + iy_1 \\ z_2 = x_2 + iy_2 \end{gather*} $$
Performing their sum, we do have:
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
And finally,
$$ \overline{z_1 + z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em} + \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
In the same way,
$$ \overline{z_1 \textcolor{#8E5B5B}{-} z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em} \textcolor{#8E5B5B}{-} \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z_1, z_2 \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z_1 = x_1 + iy_1 \\ z_2 = x_2 + iy_2 \end{gather*} $$
Performing their product, we do have:
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
Let us now calculate the product \( \overline{z_1}. \overline{z_2} \) separately:
After having calculated both expressions \( (3) \) and \( (4) \), we notice that they are equals:
As a result we do have,
$$ \overline{z_1 . z_2} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_1} \hspace{0.2em}. \hspace{0.2em} \overline{z_2} $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) and \( \overset{-}{z} \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z= x + iy \\ \overset{-}{z} = x - iy \end{gather*} $$
Performing their quotient, we do have:
Multiplying both numerator and denominator by the denominator's conjugate,
Thanks to the property of a complex number mutliplied by its conjugate, we do have:
So in our case,
Then, developping the numerator,
Now, applying the conjugate of it:
Let us now calculate the quotient \( \frac{\overline{z_1}}{ \overline{z_2}} \) separately:
In the same way as as above,
After having calculated both expressions \( (5) \) and \( (6) \), we notice that they are equals:
And finally,
$$ \overline{ \left( z_1 \over z_2 \right)} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} \frac{\overline{z_1}}{ \overline{z_2}} $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) and \( \overset{-}{z} \) under their algebraic form.
$$ \Biggl \{ \begin{gather*} z= x + iy \\ \overset{-}{z} = x - iy \end{gather*} $$
Let us calculate their product:
We know from the the third quadratic remarkable identity that:
So in our case,
And finally,
$$ z \hspace{0.2em} . \overset{-}{z} = x^2 + y^2 $$
Let us write the complex numbers \( z \) under its trigonometric form.
Calculating \( z^n \), we do have:
But we know from the Moivre's formula that:
Then, we can now write that:
Let us now apply the conjugate of it:
Furthermore, we know from the property of the module of the conjugate that:
Let us now calculate \( (\overline{z})^n \) seperately, starting from \( \overline{z} \).
With the Moivre's formula again, we do have:
After having calculated both expressions \( (7) \) et \( (8) \), we notice that they are equals:
And as a result,
$$ \overline{z^n} \hspace{0.2em} = \hspace{0.2em} (\overline{z})^n $$